February 5, 2025
459369956_406343109142230_6510181227175432064_n

Historic College Football Program Likely to Miss CFP Again

Historic College Football Program Likely to Miss CFP Again

For decades, certain college football programs have been synonymous with success, tradition, and championship aspirations. Yet, as the College Football Playoff (CFP) era continues to evolve, one such historic program is once again poised to miss the four-team field. Despite high expectations, blue-chip recruiting classes, and deep-pocketed boosters, this once-dominant program finds itself struggling to break through in an increasingly competitive landscape.

The Weight of Expectations

College football is a sport where tradition often dictates expectations. Programs like Alabama, Ohio State, and Georgia have remained in the national title picture, continuously adapting to the modern game. However, other historic powerhouses, such as USC, Michigan, Texas, and Florida State, have had varying degrees of difficulty in adjusting to the ever-changing demands of elite-level play. While some have managed to return to prominence, others still find themselves outside the CFP conversation.

This year, one particularly storied program is on the verge of missing the playoffs yet again. The reasons are multifaceted: coaching instability, underperformance in big games, injuries, and, in some cases, a lack of elite quarterback play have all contributed to this disappointing trend.

Coaching Changes and Instability

One of the biggest reasons this historic program has struggled is the revolving door of head coaches. Success in college football is often predicated on stability at the top, and frequent coaching changes make it difficult to build a long-term winning culture. The lack of continuity not only impacts on-field performance but also recruiting, as elite high school prospects value stability in coaching staff and offensive and defensive schemes.

Moreover, even when a coaching hire appears to be a home run, the inability to develop talent, make necessary in-game adjustments, and navigate the pressures of high expectations has often doomed these efforts. The difference between making the CFP and being an afterthought often comes down to coaching decisions in key moments.

Struggles Against Elite Competition

Another critical factor that has prevented this program from making the CFP is its inability to consistently win against top-tier competition. Whether it’s faltering against bitter rivals, losing conference title games, or failing to perform in high-stakes matchups, these setbacks have kept them out of the playoff picture.

In the CFP era, strength of schedule and quality wins are major components of the selection committee’s criteria. Even when this team has posted solid win-loss records, embarrassing losses to playoff-caliber teams or unranked opponents have severely damaged their resume.

Recruiting vs. Development

On paper, this program boasts some of the best recruiting classes in the country. Year after year, they land five-star prospects and finish among the top teams in national recruiting rankings. However, recruiting alone does not translate into success if player development lags.

The best programs, like Alabama and Georgia, have mastered the art of turning elite recruits into NFL-ready talent. By contrast, this historic program has seen too many top-ranked recruits underachieve or transfer out, leading to inconsistent rosters and underwhelming seasons. A high turnover rate in assistant coaches and coordinators has further hindered the team’s ability to maximize its talent.

The Quarterback Conundrum

In the modern era of college football, having an elite quarterback is often the difference between contending for a national title and falling short. The best teams of the CFP era have all been led by Heisman-caliber quarterbacks: Joe Burrow at LSU, Trevor Lawrence at Clemson, Mac Jones at Alabama, and Caleb Williams at USC, among others.

For this struggling powerhouse, quarterback play has been inconsistent at best. Whether due to injuries, poor scheme fits, or ineffective offensive coaching, they have failed to develop a game-changing signal-caller. In some cases, they have relied too much on transfer quarterbacks who have not panned out as expected.

The Road Ahead

While the current outlook appears bleak, there is still hope for a turnaround. With the College Football Playoff set to expand in the coming years, this program may finally have a better path to postseason contention. However, without addressing the core issues of coaching stability, elite player development, and consistency against top competition, their playoff drought could continue.

Fans and alumni remain hopeful that the program can reclaim its former glory. After all, college football is cyclical—what goes down often finds a way to rise again. But as another season winds down, the stark reality is that this historic powerhouse will once again be watching the CFP from the outside looking in.